Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12742981›Full record

Trial reportCirculation2003

Safety and feasibility of catheter-based local intracoronary vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer in the prevention of postangioplasty and in-stent restenosis and in the treatment of chronic myocardial ischemia: phase II results of the Kuopio Angiogenesis Trial (KAT).

Marja Hedman, Juha Hartikainen, Mikko Syvänne, Joachim Stjernvall, Antti Hedman, Antti Kivelä, Esko Vanninen, Hanna Mussalo, Esa Kauppila, Sakari Simula and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
40.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 538 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Gene therapy for atrial fibrillation.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cardioprotection in cardiovascular surgery.Basic research in cardiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marja HedmanA.I. Virtanen Institute, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Juha Hartikainen
Mikko Syvänne
Joachim Stjernvall
Antti Hedman
Antti Kivelä
Esko Vanninen
Hanna Mussalo
Esa Kauppila
Sakari Simula
Outi Närvänen
Arto Rantala
Keijo Peuhkurinen
Markku S Nieminen
Markku Laakso
Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
University of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-based intracoronary vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transfer is a potential treatment for coronary heart disease. However, only limited data are available about local VEGF gene transfer given during angioplasty (PTCA) and stenting. METHODS AND

resultsPatients with coronary heart disease (n=103; Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II to III; mean age, 58+/-6 years) were recruited in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II study. PTCA was performed with standard methods, followed by gene transfer with a perfusion-infusion catheter. Ninety percent of the patients were given stents; 37 patients received VEGF adenovirus (VEGF-Adv, 2x10(10) pfu), 28 patients received VEGF plasmid liposome (VEGF-P/L; 2000 microg of DNA with 2000 microL of DOTMA:DOPE [1:1 wt/wt]), and 38 control patients received Ringer's lactate. Follow-up time was 6 months. Gene transfer to coronary arteries was feasible and well tolerated. The overall clinical restenosis rate was 6%. In quantitative coronary angiography analysis, the minimal lumen diameter and percent of diameter stenosis did not significantly differ between the study groups. However, myocardial perfusion showed a significant improvement in the VEGF-Adv-treated patients after the 6-month follow-up. Some inflammatory responses were transiently present in the VEGF-Adv group, but no increases were detected in the incidences of serious adverse events in any of the study groups.

conclusionsGene transfer with VEGF-Adv or VEGF-P/L during PTCA and stenting shows that (1) intracoronary gene transfer can be performed safely (no major gene transfer-related adverse effects were detected), (2) no differences in clinical restenosis rate or minimal lumen diameter were present after the 6-month follow-up, and (3) a significant increase was detected in myocardial perfusion in the VEGF-Adv-treated patients.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdultAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CatheterizationChronic DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCoronary VesselsDouble-Blind MethodEndothelial Growth FactorsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFinlandGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansEndothelial Growth FactorsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLymphokinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID12742981
OpenAlexW2125150769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.