Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12740344›Full record

ArticleGut2003

Influence of dietary factors on colorectal cancer survival.

X Dray, M-C Boutron-Ruault, S Bertrais, D Sapinho, A-M Benhamiche-Bouvier, J Faivre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adherence to World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Guidelines and Mortality among Participants with Colorectal Cancer in the MEC.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association Between Intake of Red and Processed Meat and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer in a Pooled Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Article
  18. Calcium Intake and Survival after Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

X DrayInstitut Scientifique et Technique de l'Alimentation et de la Nutrition, INSERM U557, CNAM, 5 rue Vertbois, 75003 Paris, France.
M-C Boutron-Ruault
S Bertrais
D Sapinho
A-M Benhamiche-Bouvier
J Faivre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiet has been identified as a major determinant of colorectal cancer (CRC) but little is known of its influence on CRC survival.

aimsTo study the influence of dietary factors on survival in patients who had undergone potentially curative CRC surgery. PATIENTS: Among 171 patients included in a case control study of CRC aetiological factors, 10 year survival data on 148 patients who underwent resection of the tumour for potential cure were obtained from a Registry of Digestive Tumours.

methodsTertiles of food and nutrient intakes were entered into Cox proportional hazards survival models, controlling for age, sex, tumour stage, and tumour location.

resultsOnly five year survival was influenced by the pre-diagnosis diet. High energy intake, as a result of high carbohydrate, protein, and lipid intake, was strongly related to increased survival. Five year relative risk of death for the highest versus the two lowest tertiles of energy intake was 0.18 (95% confidence interval 0.07; 0.44). This effect was similar in both sexes, for the colon and for the rectum. It was stronger in patients with N+/M+ tumours (relative risk 0.06) than in those with less advanced tumours (relative risk 0.37; stage-energy interaction term non-significant). No specific food or nutrient could be identified as having prognostic significance.

conclusionsWhether high energy intake selects less severe tumoral clones or modifies antitumoral immunity remains unclear. Larger series need to be investigated before conducting intervention studies but our findings should prompt nutritional follow up in CRC patients.

Indexed as

DietAgedCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEnergy IntakeEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansMaleMicronutrientsMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesTreatment OutcomeMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID12740344
PMCPMC1773686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.