Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12740104›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2003

The discovery of long-term potentiation.

Terje Lømo

Abstract readBiographyHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advances in the Electrophysiological Recordings of Long-Term Potentiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Toward the unknown: consciousness and pain.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Challenges for Place and Grid Cell Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. GABACurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Neurobiology of reward-related learning.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Terje LømoDepartment of Physiology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1103, Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway. terje.lomo@baslmed.uio.no

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes circumstances around the discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP). In 1966, I had just begun independent work for the degree of Dr medicinae (PhD) in Per Andersen's laboratory in Oslo after an eighteen-month apprenticeship with him. Studying the effects of activating the perforant path to dentate granule cells in the hippocampus of anaesthetized rabbits, I observed that brief trains of stimuli resulted in increased efficiency of transmission at the perforant path-granule cell synapses that could last for hours. In 1968, Tim Bliss came to Per Andersen's laboratory to learn about the hippocampus and field potential recording for studies of possible memory mechanisms. The two of us then followed up my preliminary results from 1966 and did the experiments that resulted in a paper that is now properly considered to be the basic reference for the discovery of LTP.

Indexed as

Long-Term PotentiationAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyNeurophysiologyNorway

Identifiers

PMID12740104
PMCPMC1693150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.