Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12739771›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2003

Cell handling, membrane-binding properties, and membrane-penetration modeling approaches of pivampicillin and phthalimidomethylampicillin, two basic esters of ampicillin, in comparison with chloroquine and azithromycin.

Hugues Chanteux, Isabelle Paternotte, Marie-Paule Mingeot-Leclercq, Robert Brasseur, E Sonveaux, Paul M Tulkens

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hugues ChanteuxUnité de pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire, Université Catholique de Louvain, 73-70, avenue E. Mounier, 73, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. hugues.chanteux@facm.ucl.ac.be
Isabelle Paternotte
Marie-Paule Mingeot-Leclercq
Robert Brasseur
E Sonveaux
Paul M Tulkens
UCLouvain · BEGembloux Agro-Bio Tech · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this work was to examine and understand the cellular pharmacokinetics of two basic esters of ampicillin, pivaloyloxymethyl (PIVA) and phthalimidomethyl (PIMA), in comparison with lysosomotropic drugs (chloroquine, azithromycin).

methodsCell culture studies (J774 macrophages) were undertaken to study uptake and release kinetics and to assess the influence of concentration, pH, proton ionophore (monensin), and MRP and P-gp inhibitors (probenecid, gemfibrozil, cyclosporin A, GF 120918). Equilibrium dialysis with liposomes were performed to directly asses the extent of drug binding to bilayers. Conformational analysis modeling of the drug penetration in bilayers was conducted to rationalize the experimental observations.

resultsPIVA and PIMA showed properties in almost complete contrast with those of chloroquine and azithromycin, i.e., fast apparent accumulation and fast release at 4 degrees C as well as at 37 degrees C, saturation of uptake (apparent Kd 40 microM), no influence of monensin, MRP, or P-gp inhibitors; tight binding to liposomes (Kd approx. 40 microM); and sharp increase in calculated free energy when forced in the hydrophobic domain.

conclusionsAlthough they are weak organic bases, PIVA and PIMA show none of the properties of lysosomotropic agents. We hypothesize that they remain locked onto the pericellular membrane and may never penetrate cells as such in significant amounts.

Indexed as

AmpicillinAzithromycinCell Culture TechniquesCell MembraneChloroquineLysosomesMacrophagesModels, BiologicalPhthalimidesPivampicillinAmpicillinAzithromycinChloroquinePhthalimidesphthalimidomethylampicillinPivampicillin

Identifiers

PMID12739771
OpenAlexW2124738596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.