ReviewDer Pathologe2003
[Human intestinal spirochetosis].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Infectious diseases of the lower gastrointestinal tract and their differential diagnoses].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Spirochetosis Mimicking Acute Appendicitis: Clinical Report and Review of the Literature.Inflammatory intestinal diseases · 2023Article
- [Bacterial colitis].Der Pathologe · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whenever biopsy material obtained from endoscopically normal colorectal mucosa reveals the blue haematoxyphilic line between the microvilli of the covering epithelium, the rare condition of intestinal spirochetosis is diagnosed. The classification of the bacteria detected with the aid of special stains (e.g. the Warthin Starry silver stain) and in the electron microscope, continues to be something of a problem. A further point of contention is the question whether this spirochetal infection is of pathological significance or not. A point mitigating against pathogenicity is the fact that no histological signs of an inflammatory reaction are to be seen. Also, the symptoms of patients with intestinal spirochetosis are such that they provide no basis for a pronouncement on whether the infection is of a pathological or a pathological nature. On the other hand, however, a number of studies do seem to indicate that the spirochetes might be the cause of such symptoms as diarrhoea, constipation and abdominal pain. A point that would appear to support this view is the fact that such symptoms may disappear after successful treatment with metronidazole. The histological diagnosis is easily established when, faced by an apparently normal histological appearance of the colorectal mucosa, the pathologist considers the possibility of spirochetosis, and undertakes a specific search for the blue haematoxyphilic line in the covering epithelium of the colorectal mucosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.