ReviewDrug safety2003
Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma.
Review in Drug safety, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSK2190915, a 5-lipoxygenase activating protein inhibitor, in adults and adolescents with persistent asthma: a randomised dose-ranging study.Respiratory research · 2013Trial
- Safety of zafirlukast: results of a postmarketing surveillance study on 7976 patients in England.Drug safety · 2007Trial
- Montelukast and Delirium Risk During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay: Findings from a Cohort Study.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2026Article
- Review
- Substituted Caffeic and Ferulic Acid Phenethyl Esters: Synthesis, Leukotrienes Biosynthesis Inhibition, and Cytotoxic Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- The leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast and its possible role in the cardiovascular field.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Review
- A Case of Pranlukast-Induced Anaphylactic Shock.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2016Article
- Pharmacotherapy of critical asthma syndrome: current and emerging therapies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015Review
- The acute management of asthma.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015Review
- Development and validation of LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of montelukast, gliclazide, and nifedipine and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.Chemistry Central journal · 2014Article
- Clicked cinnamic/caffeic esters and amides as radical scavengers and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors.International journal of medicinal chemistry · 2014Article
- Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor-1 antagonists as modulators of innate immune cell function.Journal of immunology research · 2014Review
- Article
- Leukotriene receptor antagonists and Churg-Strauss syndrome: cause, trigger or merely an association?Drug safety · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antileukotrienes are a relatively new class of anti-asthma drugs that either block leukotriene synthesis (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors) like zileuton, or antagonise the most relevant of their receptors (the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor [CysLT1]) like montelukast, zafirlukast or pranlukast. Hence, their major effect is an anti-inflammatory one. With the exception of pranlukast, the other antileukotrienes have been studied and marketed in the US and Europe for long enough to establish that they are useful drugs in the management of asthma. Their effects, significantly better than placebo, seem more pronounced in subjective measurements (i.e. symptoms scores or quality-of-life tests) than in objective parameters (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 second or peak expiratory flow rate). Also, there is some evidence that these drugs work better in some subsets of patients with certain genetic polymorphisms - probably related to their leukotriene metabolism - or patients with certain asthma characteristics. There are a small number of comparative studies only, and with regard to long-term asthma control differences between the agents have not been evaluated. Nevertheless, their overall effect appears comparable with sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or theophylline, but significantly less than low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Antileukotrienes have been shown to have a degree of corticosteroid-sparing effect, but salmeterol appears to perform better as an add-on drug. Montelukast is probably the most useful antileukotriene for continuous treatment of exercise-induced asthma, performing as well as salmeterol without inducing any tolerance. All antileukotrienes are taken orally; their frequency of administration is quite different ranging from four times daily (zileuton) to once daily (montelukast). Antileukotrienes are well tolerated drugs, even though zileuton intake has been related to transitional liver enzyme elevations in some cases. Also Churg-Strauss syndrome (a systemic vasculitis), has been described in small numbers of patients taking CysLT1 antagonists. It is quite probable that this disease appears as a consequence of an 'unmasking' effect when corticosteroid dosages are reduced in patients with severe asthma once CysLT1 antagonists are introduced, but more data are needed to definitely establish the mechanism behind this effect. Overall, however, the benefits of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma greatly outweigh their risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.