Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12735294›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2002

A survey of genetic counselors' strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice.

Matthew A Bower, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Dianne M Bartels, Bonnie S LeRoy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with experiences of genetic discrimination among individuals at risk for Huntington disease.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew A BowerFairview University Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Patricia McCarthy Veach
Dianne M Bartels
Bonnie S LeRoy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited research about ethical and professional dilemmas that genetic counselors encounter in their practice and their strategies for addressing them. In this study, 454 genetic counselors rated the frequency with which they encounter each of 16 ethical/professional challenges identified and categorized previously (McCarthy Veach P., Bartels DM, LeRoy BS (2001) J Genet Couns 10(2):97-119). Over 40% indicated these issues occurred frequently: patient emotions, diversity, financial constraints, uncertainty, and colleague error. Two hundred and fifty-five respondents provided personal anecdotes describing exceptionally challenging situations and recommended strategies for addressing them. Most of their anecdotes involved informed consent, value conflicts, confidentiality, colleague error, withholding information, and resource allocation. The most frequently recommended strategies were further discussion with patients, consultation with other professionals, and referral to other health sources. Thirty-five respondents were unable to/did not offer strategies. Respondent demographics were not related to frequency of issues, type of anecdote, or recommended strategies. Practice, policy, and research implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Ethics, ProfessionalAttitude of Health PersonnelConfidentialityCultural DiversityData CollectionDirective CounselingDisclosureGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformed ConsentInterprofessional RelationsPatient AdvocacyProfessional CompetenceProfessional-Family RelationsBioethics and Professional EthicsEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.