Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12734273›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Variation in susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata to fluconazole according to patient age and geographic location.

M A Pfaller, S A Messer, L Boyken, S Tendolkar, R J Hollis, D J Diekema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  3. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) Genotypes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  4. Comparative Genomics of Two SequentialG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advances in the treatment of invasive neonatal candidiasis.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Current fungal infection reports · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk factors for fluconazole-resistant candidemia.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for invasive candidiasis in adults.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M A PfallerDepartment of Pathology, Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
S A Messer
L Boyken
S Tendolkar
R J Hollis
D J Diekema

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the susceptibilities to fluconazole of 559 bloodstream infection isolates of Candida glabrata and grouped the isolates by patient age and geographic location within the United States. Susceptibility of C. glabrata to fluconazole was lowest in the Pacific (44%) and East South Central (47%) regions and was highest in the West South Central region (82%) (regions are as designated by the U.S. Bureau of the Census). Isolates from pediatric patients were virtually all susceptible to fluconazole, whereas the highest frequency of resistance was observed in isolates from patients 16 to 64 years of age.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntifungal AgentsCandida glabrataCandidiasisChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleFungemiaHumansInfantIn Vitro TechniquesAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID12734273
PMCPMC154732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.