ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2003
Spatiotemporal sites of DNA replication in macro- and micronuclei of the ciliate Paramecium caudatum.
Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A 63-kDa Periplasmic Protein of the Endonuclear Symbiotic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- DNA replication and transcription in new macronuclei of Paramecium caudatum exconjugants.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatiotemporal sites of DNA replication in macro- and micronuclei of the ciliated protozoan Paramecium caudatum were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy following incorporation of the thymidine analogue BrdU and indirect immunofluorescence. In the macronucleus, replication sites were localized to numerous small domains and scattered throughout the nucleoplasm. This pattern persisted during all periods of the S phase. A single constant pattern with discrete replication foci was also observed in the micronucleus. No obvious differences were seen between the two kinds of nuclei. Pulse-chase-pulse double-labeling experiments with two thymidine analogues (CldU and IdU) revealed that dispersed sites of replication were activated at different times during the S phase and a replication site takes about 2h to complete replication in the macronucleus. When cells were labeled by BrUTP to examine transcriptional activity in the two kinds of nuclei, incorporation of BrUTP into the macronucleus occurred throughout the cell cycle, whereas there was no detectable RNA synthesis in the micronucleus. From these findings, we conclude that, despite large differences in structure and function of macro- and micronuclear genomes, both nuclei show a similar replication pattern with discrete subnuclear foci scattered throughout the nucleoplasm at all times during the S phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.