Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12731664›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2003

Novel therapies in multiple myeloma.

Seema Singhal, Jayesh Mehta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effects on bone metabolism of new therapeutic strategies with standard chemotherapy and biologic drugs.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases · 2013
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment of multiple myeloma.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
  10. Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seema SinghalMultiple Myeloma Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Feinberg School of Medicine, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. s-singhal@northwestern.edu
Jayesh Mehta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the activity of thalidomide in myeloma in the late 1990s transformed the therapy of myeloma dramatically. Apart from providing a useful treatment option for patients with myeloma, it has spurred clinical investigation of several other nonchemotherapeutic agents for this disease. These active, promising agents include CC-5013 (a thalidomide analog) and bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor), as well as other agents, such as arsenic trioxide, ENMD 0995 and 2-methoxyestradiol. Preliminary data show that a number of these agents are active in treating disease that has relapsed after conventional chemotherapy as well as after high-dose therapy and transplantation, and some agents are active even after other novel agents have failed. The only novel drug that is commercially available currently is thalidomide, which has a therapeutically relevant benefit at all stages of the disease. A therapeutic trial of thalidomide is essential for all patients with myeloma. There are in vitro and in vivo data showing synergy between some of the novel agents. Although these novel drugs are typically used for treating disease that is refractory to or has relapsed after cytotoxic therapy, it is likely that they will start being used as part of frontline therapy, either by themselves or in combination with chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBoronic AcidsBortezomibHumansLenalidomideMultiple MyelomaPyrazinesThalidomideBoronic AcidsBortezomibLenalidomidePyrazinesThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID12731664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.