ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2003
Changes in bone mineral density in the hip and spine before, during, and after the menopause in elite runners.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of High-Impact Exercise on Bone Marker Concentrations During Controlled Low Energy Availability in Recreational Female Runners.Calcified tissue international · 2026Trial
- Older women track and field athletes have enhanced calcaneal stiffness.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine the degree of interaction between hormonal and athletic effects on changes in bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm(2)) with time in women around the menopause. Thirty-five elite female runners aged over 40 participated in a longitudinal cohort study of hip and spine bone density changes and had two measurements a mean of 4.1 years apart. Eighteen remained estrogenized throughout the study (E+ to +), ten remained postmenopausal throughout (E- to -), while seven showed a change in status (E- to +) or (E+ to -). At study exit, both postmenopausal E+ and E- subjects had significantly higher than expected broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and velocity of sound (VOS) values at the calcaneus. However, Z-score 95% confidence intervals for BMD of the hip and spine embraced zero except at the femoral trochanter in E+ women. The E+ to + group did not lose bone at any site. The E- to - group lost bone significantly, but only at the femoral neck and spine at rates close to 1% annually. Multiple analysis of variance repeated measures analysis showed a significant interaction in the effects of estrogen exposure with DXA measurement site, with the femoral trochanter being less affected by E- status than the spine and femoral neck. Body mass index (BMI: weight/height(2), kg/m(2)) had a significantly positive effect on total hip and femoral neck BMD independently of estrogen status. In conclusion, in this pilot study, postmenopausal elite runners not on hormone replacement therapy lost BMD from the femoral neck and spine at the expected rates but in the femoral trochanter bone loss appeared reduced and in the calcaneus BUA and VOS were maintained close to young normal values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.