Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12724052›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2003

Microalbuminuria in hypertension.

Paolo Palatini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo PalatiniDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. palatini@unipd.it
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A body of evidence indicates that microalbuminuria is a well-recognized marker of cardiovascular complications and increased cardiovascular risk in hypertension. However, the prognostic significance of microalbuminuria remains controversial because only the results of a few prospective studies performed in small groups of hypertensive subjects without diabetes mellitus are available. Several factors can affect the prevalence of microalbuminuria in hypertension including age, sex, race, severity of the disease, and concomitant risk factors. This accounts for the large differences in the prevalence of microalbuminuria that can be found in the literature, with prevalence rates going from a low of 4.7% to a high of 46%. The main determinant of albumin excretion rate in subjects with mild hypertension and no cardiovascular complications seems to be the hemodynamic load, whereas in subjects with more severe hypertension and associated target organ damage, the augmented urinary albumin leak is probably the consequence of glomerular damage. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists is particularly effective at reducing the albumin excretion rate, but whether these classes of drugs are more beneficial in patients with microalbuminuria remains to be determined. There is general consensus that evaluation of microalbuminuria is useful for the assessment of overall cardiovascular risk in hypertension, since albumin excretion rate appears to be a cost-effective way to identify patients at higher risk for whom additional preventive and therapeutic measures are advisable.

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaCardiovascular DiseasesHemodynamicsHumansHypertensionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsVascular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID12724052
OpenAlexW2079428009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.