ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2003
Microalbuminuria in hypertension.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of microalbuminuria and adverse outcomes in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2021Pooled it
- ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018Guideline
- Article
- Lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components in the prediagnostic phase of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Lipid metabolism disorders and albuminuria risk: insights from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2018 and Mendelian randomization analyses.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and kidney function: Follow-up results from the Diabetes Prevention Program trial.Environment international · 2021Article
- Baseline albuminuria predicts the efficacy of blood pressure-lowering drugs in preventing cardiovascular events.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008Article
- Type of renal calculi: variation with age and sex.World journal of urology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A body of evidence indicates that microalbuminuria is a well-recognized marker of cardiovascular complications and increased cardiovascular risk in hypertension. However, the prognostic significance of microalbuminuria remains controversial because only the results of a few prospective studies performed in small groups of hypertensive subjects without diabetes mellitus are available. Several factors can affect the prevalence of microalbuminuria in hypertension including age, sex, race, severity of the disease, and concomitant risk factors. This accounts for the large differences in the prevalence of microalbuminuria that can be found in the literature, with prevalence rates going from a low of 4.7% to a high of 46%. The main determinant of albumin excretion rate in subjects with mild hypertension and no cardiovascular complications seems to be the hemodynamic load, whereas in subjects with more severe hypertension and associated target organ damage, the augmented urinary albumin leak is probably the consequence of glomerular damage. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists is particularly effective at reducing the albumin excretion rate, but whether these classes of drugs are more beneficial in patients with microalbuminuria remains to be determined. There is general consensus that evaluation of microalbuminuria is useful for the assessment of overall cardiovascular risk in hypertension, since albumin excretion rate appears to be a cost-effective way to identify patients at higher risk for whom additional preventive and therapeutic measures are advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.