Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12721495›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2003

The use of capillary electrophoresis for DNA polymorphism analysis.

Keith R Mitchelson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith R MitchelsonAustralian Genome Research Facility, University of Queensland, Level 5, Gehrmonn Laboratories, Research Road, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. keith@agrf.org.au
Australian Genome Research Facility · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis has advanced enormously over the last 10 yr as a tool for DNA sequencing, driven by the human and other major genome projects and by the need for rapid electrophoresis-based DNA diagnostic tests. The common need of these analyses is a platform providing very high throughput, high-quality data, and low process costs. These demands have led to capillary electrophoresis machines with multiple capillaries providing highly parallel analyses, to new electrophoresis matrices, to highly sensitive spectrofluorometers, and to brighter, spectrally distinct fluorescent dyes with which to label DNA. Capillary devices have also been engineered onto microchip formats, on which both the amount of sample required for analysis and the speed of analysis are increased by an order of magnitude. This review examines the advances made in capillary and chip-based microdevices and in the different DNA-based assays developed for mutation detection and genotype analysis using capillary electrophoresis. The automation of attendant processes such as for DNA sample preparation, PCR, and analyte purification are also reviewed. Together, these technological developments provide the throughput demanded by the large genome-sequencing projects.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalDNA Mutational AnalysisElectrophoresis, CapillaryEquipment DesignMicrochemistryPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID12721495
OpenAlexW2015041290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.