ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2003
Characterization of a fluorescent conjugate of the rabbit angiotensin AT(1) receptor.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The rabbit AT(1) receptor (AT(1)R) for angiotensin II (A(II)) has been conjugated to the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in order to establish the pharmacological profile of such a fusion protein and to facilitate the study of ligand-induced regulation. 2. A(II) bound AT(1)R-YFP (K(D) 8.1 nM in transiently transfected cells) and stimulated HEK 293 cells expressing the fusion protein at concentration ranges similar to the ones that stimulate the contraction of the isolated rabbit aorta. Antagonists found to be insurmountable in the latter assay (candesartan and EXP-3174 being the most extreme cases) were also insurmountable in the phospholipase A(2) assay applied to cells expressing AT(1)R-YFP, whereas losartan appeared to be surmountable in both assays. 3. Cells expressing AT(1)R-YFP exhibited a membrane-associated fluorescence that was partly and reversibly translocated into intracellular structures upon A(II) stimulation (confocal microscopy); the nonpeptide antagonists were not active in this respect, but prevented the effect of the agonist. 4. A(II) treatment increased the quantity of the fusion protein in cells, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) treatment even more so (immunoblot, confocal microscopy) but, unlike the agonist, the latter drug did not induce receptor endocytosis. A protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor prevented the effect of either A(II) or PMA on AT(1)R-YFP abundance. 5. The conjugate AT(1)R-YFP retains the pharmacological properties of the parent rabbit AT(1)R. Agonist-induced downregulation was not documented using this system; to the contrary, we have observed a PKC-mediated increased expression AT(1)R-YFP likely to be the result of a decreased breakdown rate of the fusion protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.