Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12719553›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2003

Mutational analysis of open reading frames 62 and 71, encoding the varicella-zoster virus immediate-early transactivating protein, IE62, and effects on replication in vitro and in skin xenografts in the SCID-hu mouse in vivo.

Bunji Sato, Hideki Ito, Stewart Hinchliffe, Marvin H Sommer, Leigh Zerboni, Ann M Arvin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Varicella-zoster virus T cell tropism and the pathogenesis of skin infection.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bunji SatoDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Hideki Ito
Stewart Hinchliffe
Marvin H Sommer
Leigh Zerboni
Ann M Arvin
Stanford University · US

Funding

Varicella-zoster Virus: Tegument Proteins in PathogenesisR01AI053846 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ARVIN, ANN · 2003 to 2012
$4.1M
VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS PATHOGENESISR01AI036884 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HAY, JOHN I. · 1996 to 2000
$722k
Varicella Zoster Virus PathogenesisR21AI036884 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HAY, JOHN I. · 2001 to 2001
$149k
NIAID NIH HHS AI053846NIAID NIH HHS AI36884NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI053846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The varicella-zoster virus (VZV) genome has unique long (U(L)) and unique short (U(S)) segments which are flanked by internal repeat (IR) and terminal repeat (TR) sequences. The immediate-early 62 (IE62) protein, encoded by open reading frame 62 (ORF62) and ORF71 in these repeats, is the major VZV transactivating protein. Mutational analyses were done with VZV cosmids generated from parent Oka (pOka), a low-passage clinical isolate, and repair experiments were done with ORF62 from pOka and vaccine Oka (vOka), which is derived from pOka. Transfections using VZV cosmids from which ORF62, ORF71, or the ORF62/71 gene pair was deleted showed that VZV replication required at least one copy of ORF62. The insertion of ORF62 from pOka or vOka into a nonnative site in U(S) allowed VZV replication in cell culture in vitro, although the plaque size and yields of infectious virus were decreased. Targeted mutations in binding sites reported to affect interaction with IE4 protein and a putative ORF9 protein binding site were not lethal. Single deletions of ORF62 or ORF71 from cosmids permitted recovery of infectious virus, but recombination events repaired the defective repeat region in some progeny viruses, as verified by PCR and Southern hybridization. VZV infectivity in skin xenografts in the SCID-hu model required ORF62 expression; mixtures of single-copy recombinant Oka Delta 62 (rOka Delta 62) or rOka Delta 71 and repaired rOka generated by recombination of the single-copy deletion mutants were detected in some skin implants. Although insertion of ORF62 into the nonnative site permitted replication in cell culture, ORF62 expression from its native site was necessary for cell-cell spread in differentiated human skin tissues in vivo.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisVirus ReplicationAnimalsCosmidsGene Expression Regulation, ViralHerpesvirus 3, HumanHumansImmediate-Early ProteinsMelanomaMiceMice, SCIDOpen Reading FramesPlasmidsRecombination, GeneticSkin TransplantationTrans-ActivatorsIE62 protein, Human herpesvirus 3Immediate-Early ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12719553
PMCPMC154054
OpenAlexW2151868397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.