Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12719450›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2003

Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes.

G Cserni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive Value of [Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  8. SerumOncotarget · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G CserniDepartment of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kacskemét, Hungary. cserni@freemail.hu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review surveys the staging systems used for the classification of colorectal carcinomas, including the TNM system, and focuses on the assessment of the nodal stage of the disease. It reviews the quantitative requirements for a regional metastatic work up, and some qualitative features of lymph nodes that may help in the selection of positive and negative lymph nodes. Identification of the sentinel lymph nodes (those lymph nodes that have direct drainage from the primary tumour site) is one such qualitative feature that is claimed to allow the upstaging of colorectal carcinomas via an oriented, enhanced pathological work up. Current evidence in favour of a change in the requisite of assessing as may lymph nodes as is possible, and concentrating the efforts on only a selected number of lymph nodes, is weak.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID12719450
PMCPMC1769958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.