ReviewArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2003
Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?
Review in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Children Aged 1-59 Months with Severe Pneumonia and Hypoxemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Indian pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions for the management of transient tachypnoea of the newborn - an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Weaning of nasal CPAP in preterm infants: who, when and how? a systematic review of the literature.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- Sudden versus gradual pressure wean from Nasal CPAP in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Trial
- CeasIng Cpap At standarD criteriA (CICADA): predicting a successful outcome.European journal of pediatrics · 2016Trial
- Article
- A survey on the use of continuous positive airway pressure in newborn care in Kenya in 2017-2018.PloS one · 2025Article
- Satisfaction of Health Professionals Regarding the Short Binasal Prong Used as a Non-Invasive Ventilation Interface in Neonatology.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Aerosol drug delivery to spontaneously-breathing preterm neonates: lessons learned.Respiratory research · 2021Review
- A Review on Non-invasive Respiratory Support for Management of Respiratory Distress in Extremely Preterm Infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Comparison of NIV-NAVA and NCPAP in facilitating extubation for very preterm infants.BMC pediatrics · 2019Article
- Comparison of Seven and Five Centimetre of Water as Initiating Continuous Airway Pressure Levels in Preterm Neonates with Respiratory Distress.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
- Weaning preterm infants from continuous positive airway pressure: evidence for best practice.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2015Review
- Electrical impedance tomography to evaluate air distribution prior to extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants: a feasibility study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2013Article
- Born too soon: care for the preterm baby.Reproductive health · 2013Review
- Factors Affecting the Weaning from Nasal CPAP in Preterm Neonates.International journal of pediatrics · 2012Article
- Danger of low pressure alarm failure in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure.European journal of pediatrics · 2010Article
- Lung protective ventilatory strategies in very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the acknowledged clinical usefulness of nasal CPAP, uncertainties regarding aspects of its application remain. Clinical indications for the application of nasal CPAP vary greatly between institutions. Furthermore, defining the optimal nasal CPAP system is complicated by the multiplicity of nasal CPAP devices and techniques available to the clinician. This review aims to identify what we know about nasal CPAP and what important questions remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.