Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12718800›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2003

Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Seema Singhal, Jayesh Mehta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Lenalidomide in myeloma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seema SinghalDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Feinberg School of Medicine, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 850, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. s-singhal@northwestern.edu
Jayesh Mehta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of relapsed and refractory myeloma was straightforward when melphalan-prednisone constituted the mainstay of treatment and high-dose therapy with transplantation was rarely used in myeloma. However, several advances have occurred in the treatment of myeloma over the past decade. Most notably, high-dose therapy and transplantation have become broadly applicable, thalidomide has become available as effective salvage therapy, and several investigational agents with novel mechanisms of action appear to be very promising. Because of the differing properties of some of these agents, it is often possible to control the disease with an alternative treatment approach after the failure of one therapy. Some data indicate that combinations of these agents work when the drugs have failed individually. Therefore, refractory myeloma indicates disease unresponsive to the most recent therapy administered. Broadly, the salvage approaches that are used in patients with refractory or relapsed disease include high-dose dexamethasone, high-dose chemotherapy with autotransplantation, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, thalidomide-based therapies, and novel/investigational agents. The appropriate therapy for a given situation depends on the nature of the disease, age, organ function, bone marrow function, prior treatment, the availability of stem cell donors, and access to novel agents. A therapeutic trial of thalidomide is essential at some stage of the disease in all patients. High-dose therapy with autotransplantation is needed at some stage of the disease in most patients younger than 65 to 70 years.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeovascularization, PathologicRadiation DosageTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.