ArticleAtencion primaria2003
[Factors linked to structural quality in the guidelines for clinical practice of physiotherapy].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the characteristics associated with better structural quality of protocols.Design. Analytic and transversal.Setting. Health centres in Spain with physiotherapy protocols.
participantsGuidelines for physiotherapy practice or protocols worked out between 1990 and 1996, inclusive. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The design quality of the documents was evaluated by using percentages of compliance with eight explicit validated criteria and the proportion of criteria complied with in each protocol out of the total possible. To identify the characteristics linked to structural quality, multiple and logistic regression multivariate analyses were performed.
resultsThere was greater structural quality in documents worked out by teams of over five authors and after 1992. Variables that did not affect structural quality were the source of the protocol (Insalud or autonomous community with devolved powers) and the kind of professional (only physiotherapists or multi-disciplinary) who worked it out.
conclusionsThe quality of the documents varies according to the date and the number of authors who work them out. There was significantly greater quality when this was after 1992 and there were over five authors. Therefore, under the opposite circumstances (few authors), there is greater risk of low-quality documents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.