ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2003
Identification of bacteria contaminating pulp and a paper machine in a Canadian paper mill.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial diversity in various types of paper mill sludge: identification of enzyme activities with potential industrial applications.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- Inhibition of various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria growth on selenium nanoparticle coated paper towels.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
- Biofilm-forming bacteria with varying tolerance to peracetic acid from a paper machine.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2011Article
- Early succession of bacterial biofilms in paper machines.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2009Article
- Carbon utilization profiles of bacteria colonizing the headbox water of two paper machines in a Canadian mill.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2009Article
- Characterisation of aerobically grown non-spore-forming bacteria from paper mill pulps containing recycled fibres.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2009Article
- Prokaryotic microbiota of recycled paper mills with low or zero effluent.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2008Article
- Microbe repelling coated stainless steel analysed by field emission scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical methods.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2008Article
- Detection and quantitation of colored deposit-forming Meiothermus spp. in paper industry processes and end products.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2007Article
- Diversity of bacteria contaminating paper machines.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2006Article
- Colanic acid is an exopolysaccharide common to many enterobacteria isolated from paper-machine slimes.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2006Article
- Polysaccharide-producing bacteria isolated from paper machine slime deposits.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 100 bacteria from pulp and slime samples in a Canadian paper mill were identified by partial sequencing of their 16S rDNAs. Seventy-one percent of the isolates could be assigned to a bacterial genus with a high level of confidence. Another 12% exhibited at least 95% similarity within their 16S rDNA sequence with unidentified organisms that originate from warm or wet environments. Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Pseudoxanthomonas isolates were represented at a relatively high proportion in both pulp and slime samples. This is the first time that Pseudoxanthomonas strains have been isolated from pulp and slime samples on a paper machine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12715250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.