Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12713671›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2003

Genetic variability in MCF-7 sublines: evidence of rapid genomic and RNA expression profile modifications.

Mélanie Nugoli, Paul Chuchana, Julie Vendrell, Béatrice Orsetti, Lisa Ursule, Catherine Nguyen, Daniel Birnbaum, Emmanuel J P Douzery, Pascale Cohen, Charles Theillet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancements in Zebrafish Models for Breast Cancer Research: Unveiling Biomarkers, Targeted Therapies, and Personalized Medicine.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Power and Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts of Human Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mélanie NugoliEquipe Génome et Cancer, UMR 5535, CNRS and EMI 0229, INSERM, Centre de Recherche CRLC Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France. nugoli@valdorel.fnclcc.fr
Paul Chuchana
Julie Vendrell
Béatrice Orsetti
Lisa Ursule
Catherine Nguyen
Daniel Birnbaum
Emmanuel J P Douzery
Pascale Cohen
Charles Theillet
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRInserm · FRInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth phenotypic and cytogenetic variability have been reported for clones of breast carcinoma cell lines but have not been comprehensively studied. Despite this, cell lines such as MCF-7 cells are extensively used as model systems.

methodsIn this work we documented, using CGH and RNA expression profiles, the genetic variability at the genomic and RNA expression levels of MCF-7 cells of different origins. Eight MCF-7 sublines collected from different sources were studied as well as 3 subclones isolated from one of the sublines by limit dilution.

resultsMCF-7 sublines showed important differences in copy number alteration (CNA) profiles. Overall numbers of events ranged from 28 to 41. Involved chromosomal regions varied greatly from a subline to another. A total of 62 chromosomal regions were affected by either gains or losses in the 11 sublines studied. We performed a phylogenetic analysis of CGH profiles using maximum parsimony in order to reconstruct the putative filiation of the 11 MCF-7 sublines. The phylogenetic tree obtained showed that the MCF-7 clade was characterized by a restricted set of 8 CNAs and that the most divergent subline occupied the position closest to the common ancestor. Expression profiles of 8 MCF-7 sublines were analyzed along with those of 19 unrelated breast cancer cell lines using home made cDNA arrays comprising 720 genes. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the expression data showed that 7/8 MCF-7 sublines were grouped forming a cluster while the remaining subline clustered with unrelated breast cancer cell lines. These data thus showed that MCF-7 sublines differed at both the genomic and phenotypic levels.

conclusionsThe analysis of CGH profiles of the parent subline and its three subclones supported the heteroclonal nature of MCF-7 cells. This strongly suggested that the genetic plasticity of MCF-7 cells was related to their intrinsic capacity to generate clonal heterogeneity. We propose that MCF-7, and possibly the breast tumor it was derived from, evolved in a node like pattern, rather than according to a linear progression model. Due to their capacity to undergo rapid genetic changes MCF-7 cells could represent an interesting model for genetic evolution of breast tumors.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorChromosome AberrationsGenetic VariationBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyRNA, NeoplasmRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID12713671
PMCPMC156633
OpenAlexW2167383891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.