Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12709347›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

Persistence of Salmonellae in blood and bone marrow: randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol treatments against enteric fever.

M Hussein Gasem, Monique Keuter, Wil M V Dolmans, Johanna Van Der Ven-Jongekrijg, Robert Djokomoeljanto, Jos W M Van Der Meer

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Busting the Myth of "Static vs Cidal": A Systemic Literature Review.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Fluoroquinolones for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Quantitative bacterial counts in the bone marrow of Vietnamese patients with typhoid fever.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Typhoid Fever.Current infectious disease reports · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M Hussein GasemDepartment of Medicine, Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Monique Keuter
Wil M V Dolmans
Johanna Van Der Ven-Jongekrijg
Robert Djokomoeljanto
Jos W M Van Der Meer
Radboud University Medical Center · NLDiponegoro University · IDRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a randomized controlled trial involving 55 adult patients with enteric fever to compare ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol. Blood and bone marrow cultures and cytokine profiles during therapy were done to compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacies of these drugs. All patients were randomly assigned to receive chloramphenicol (500 mg four times a day orally) for 14 days or ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice a day orally) for 7 days. In each treatment group, patients were subsequently randomized to have blood and bone marrow cultured after either 3 or 5 days of treatment. Twenty-seven patients received chloramphenicol, and 28 received ciprofloxacin. The two groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. No significant differences in clinical cure and time to defervescence were found. All strains isolated were susceptible to both antibiotics. Although ciprofloxacin was more effective in the elimination of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A from bone marrow than chloramphenicol, there was still an impressive persistence of Salmonella in the bone marrow culture (67%). In the ciprofloxacin-treated patients the suppressed cytokine production capacity showed a trend to normalize earlier than in patients treated with chloramphenicol.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBacteremiaBone MarrowChloramphenicolCiprofloxacinCytokinesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSalmonella typhiTyphoid FeverChloramphenicolCiprofloxacinCytokines

Identifiers

PMID12709347
PMCPMC153327
OpenAlexW2139453269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.