ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003
In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Pooled it
- A Review of Fluoroquinolones with a Focus on Veterinary-Approved Agents.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Concentrations and the Acquisition of Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria in Critically Ill Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharmacodynamic Profiling of Amoxicillin: Targeting Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive PathogensAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic integration and resistance analysis of cefquinome againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Fluoroquinolone resistance in ESKAPE pathogens: evolutionary pathways, one health transmission, and clinical surveillance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Diverse mutant selection windows shape spatial heterogeneity in evolving populations.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Diverse mutant selection windows shape spatial heterogeneity in evolving populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling framework as a tool to predict drug resistance evolution.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023Article
- Meropenem MICs at Standard and High Inocula and Mutant Prevention Concentration Inter-Relations: Comparative Study with Non-Carbapenemase-Producing and OXA-48-, KPC- and NDM-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Use of Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine, a Complex Phenomenon: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Moxifloxacin-Mediated Killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Involves Respiratory Downshift, Reductive Stress, and Accumulation of Reactive Oxygen Species.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Why We May Need Higher Doses of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: Introducing the 'Maximum Tolerable Dose'.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nisin Influence on the Antimicrobial Resistance Ability of Canine Oral Enterococci.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Pharmacokinetics in plasma and alveolar regions of healthy calves subcutaneously administered a single dose of enrofloxacin.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2020Article
- Evolution of antibiotic cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity inEvolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Resistance Evolution Against Antimicrobial Peptides inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Molecular characteristics, pathogenicity and medication regimen of Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.).The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2019Article
- Aggressive or moderate drug therapy for infectious diseases? Trade-offs between different treatment goals at the individual and population levels.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To study the hypothesis of the mutant selection window (MSW) in a pharmacodynamic context, the susceptibility of a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exposed to moxifloxacin (MOX), gatifloxacin (GAT), levofloxacin (LEV), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) was tested daily by using an in vitro dynamic model that simulates human pharmacokinetics. A series of monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles that mimic once-daily administration of MOX (half-life, 12 h), GAT (half-life, 7 h), and LEV (half-life, 6.8 h) and twice-daily administration of CIP (half-life, 4 h) provided peak concentrations (C(max)) that either equaled the MIC, fell between the MIC and the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) (i.e., within or "inside" the MSW), or exceeded the MPC. The respective ratios of the area under the curve (AUC) over a 24-h dosing interval (AUC(24)) to the MIC varied from 13 to 244 h, and the starting inoculum was 10(8) CFU/ml (6 x 10(9) CFU per 60-ml central compartment). With all four quinolones, the greatest increases in MIC were observed at those AUC(24)/MIC values (from 24 to 62 h) that corresponded to quinolone concentrations within the MSW over most of the dosing interval (>20%). Less-pronounced increases in MIC were associated with the smallest simulated AUC(24)/MIC values (15 to 16 h) of GAT and CIP, whose C(max) exceeded the MICs. No such increases were observed with the smallest AUC(24)/MIC values (13 to 17 h) of MOX and LEV, whose C(max) were close to the MICs. Also, less pronounced but significant increases in MIC occurred at AUC(24)/MIC values (107 to 123 h) that correspond to quinolone concentrations partly overlapping the MIC-to-MPC range. With all four drugs, no change in MIC was seen at the highest AUC(24)/MIC values (201 to 244 h), where quinolone concentrations exceeded the MPC over most of the dosing interval. These "protective" AUC(24)/MIC ratios correspond to 66% of the usual clinical dose of MOX (400 mg), 190% of a 400-mg dose of GAT, 220% of a 500-mg dose of LEV, and 420% of two 500-mg doses of CIP. Thus, MOX may protect against resistance development at subtherapeutic doses, whereas GAT, LEV, and CIP provide similar effects only at doses that exceed their usual clinical doses. These data support the concept that resistant mutants are selectively enriched when antibiotic concentrations fall inside the MSW and suggest that in vitro dynamic models can be used to predict the relative abilities of quinolones to prevent mutant selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.