ArticleChromosoma2003
Mouse telomere analysis using an optimized primed in situ (PRINS) labeling technique.
Article in Chromosoma, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A resonance Rayleigh scattering sensor for sensitive differentiation of telomere DNA length and monitoring special motifs (G-quadruplex and i-motif) based on the Ag nanoclusters and NAND logic gate responding to chemical input signals.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2018Article
- Review
- Proteome-wide identification of WRN-interacting proteins in untreated and nuclease-treated samples.Journal of proteome research · 2011Article
- Article
- The telomere length dynamic and methods of its assessment.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telomeres are chromosomal elements composed of variable numbers of a TTAGGG repeated DNA sequence required for genomic stability. Telomeric length is correlated with the number of copies of this repeated DNA sequence and is an important property relevant to telomeric function. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the length of the shortest telomere, not average telomeric length, is important for cell viability and chromosomal stability. Consequently, assays permitting assessment of telomeric length are important for the analysis of genomic instability disorders. The length of individual telomeres can be analyzed using the primed in situ (PRINS) labeling reaction, which produces a labeled copy of the telomeric DNA repeats in situ. In this study, we tested different variables to optimize the PRINS reaction to enable it to be applied to the detection of mouse telomeric DNA and the study of telomeric length. The specificity, efficiency and uniformity of staining were evaluated using digital fluorescence microscopy. Labeling efficiency is dependent upon the conditions used to denature the telomeric DNA and reaction duration. Staining uniformity is increased at higher annealing and elongation temperatures as well as when a fluorescently labeled nucleotide is incorporated during the elongation step. Our results also indicate that chromosomal background staining is observed when a fluorochrome-labeled nucleotide is used as opposed to a hapten-labeled nucleotide. From this study, we conclude that an optimized PRINS technique can be reliably employed to analyze mouse telomeres and, compared with the FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) technique, presents advantages including greater cost efficiency and reduced processing time. These advantages may encourage wider use of the PRINS technique for quantitative evaluation of the length of individual telomeres in situ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.