Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12707371›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2003

Analysis of microarray data using Z score transformation.

Chris Cheadle, Marquis P Vawter, William J Freed, Kevin G Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 513 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
513citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

513 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Overexpression ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CNR1 and CNR2 Cannabinoid Receptor Mutations in Cancer Cells.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

453 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris CheadleDNA Array Unit, Research Resources Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21221, USA.
Marquis P Vawter
William J Freed
Kevin G Becker

Funding

Immortalized Cell LinesZIADA000410 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI FREED, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2011
$1.0M
IMMORTALIZED CELL LINESZ01DA000410 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI FREED, WILLIAM J · 1998 to 2008
$866k
Studies of Drug Abuse using Postmortem TissueZ01DA000411 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI FREED, WILLIAM J · 1998 to 2008
$476k
Studies of Drug Abuse using Human Postmortem TissueZIADA000411 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI FREED, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2010
$293k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput cDNA microarray technology allows for the simultaneous analysis of gene expression levels for thousands of genes and as such, rapid, relatively simple methods are needed to store, analyze, and cross-compare basic microarray data. The application of a classical method of data normalization, Z score transformation, provides a way of standardizing data across a wide range of experiments and allows the comparison of microarray data independent of the original hybridization intensities. Data normalized by Z score transformation can be used directly in the calculation of significant changes in gene expression between different samples and conditions. We used Z scores to compare several different methods for predicting significant changes in gene expression including fold changes, Z ratios, Z and t statistical tests. We conclude that the Z score transformation normalization method accompanied by either Z ratios or Z tests for significance estimates offers a useful method for the basic analysis of microarray data. The results provided by these methods can be as rigorous and are no more arbitrary than other test methods, and, in addition, they have the advantage that they can be easily adapted to standard spreadsheet programs.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA, ComplementaryDown-RegulationHumansJurkat CellsModels, StatisticalNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNAStatistics as TopicUp-RegulationDNA, ComplementaryRNA

Identifiers

PMID12707371
PMCPMC1907322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.