Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12707239›Full record

ArticleCirculation2003

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy.

Pascale Richard, Philippe Charron, Lucie Carrier, Céline Ledeuil, Theary Cheav, Claire Pichereau, Abdelaziz Benaiche, Richard Isnard, Olivier Dubourg, Marc Burban and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 498 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
498citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

498 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Guideline
  8. Clinical outcomes associated with sarcomere mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis on 7675 individuals.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

438 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Pascale RichardUF de Cardiogénétique et Myogénétique, Service de Biochimie B, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France. pascale.richard@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr
Philippe Charron
Lucie Carrier
Céline Ledeuil
Theary Cheav
Claire Pichereau
Abdelaziz Benaiche
Richard Isnard
Olivier Dubourg
Marc Burban
Jean-Pierre Gueffet
Alain Millaire
Michel Desnos
Ketty Schwartz
Bernard Hainque
Michel Komajda
EUROGENE Heart Failure Project

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy is an autosomal-dominant disorder in which 10 genes and numerous mutations have been reported. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic screening of these genes in a large population, to evaluate the distribution of the disease genes, and to determine the best molecular strategy in clinical practice. METHODS AND

resultsThe entire coding sequences of 9 genes (MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNI3, TNNT2, MYL2, MYL3, TPM1, ACTC, andTNNC1) were analyzed in 197 unrelated index cases with familial or sporadic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Disease-causing mutations were identified in 124 index patients ( approximately 63%), and 97 different mutations, including 60 novel ones, were identified. The cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3) and beta-myosin heavy chain (MYH7) genes accounted for 82% of families with identified mutations (42% and 40%, respectively). Distribution of the genes varied according to the prognosis (P=0.036). Moreover, a mutation was found in 15 of 25 index cases with "sporadic" hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (60%). Finally, 6 families had patients with more than one mutation, and phenotype analyses suggested a gene dose effect in these compound-heterozygous, double-heterozygous, or homozygous patients.

conclusionsThese results might have implications for genetic diagnosis strategy and, subsequently, for genetic counseling. First, on the basis of this experience, the screening of already known mutations is not helpful. The analysis should start by testing MYBPC3 and MYH7 and then focus on TNNI3, TNNT2, and MYL2. Second, in particularly severe phenotypes, several mutations should be searched. Finally, sporadic cases can be successfully screened.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationCardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, FamilialCarrier ProteinsGenotypeHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMyosin Binding Protein CMyosin Heavy ChainsPrognosisCarrier ProteinsMyosin Binding Protein CMyosin Heavy Chains

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.