Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12706919›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2003

Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide for risk assessment in unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in TACTICS-TIMI 18.

David A Morrow, James A de Lemos, Marc S Sabatine, Sabina A Murphy, Laura A Demopoulos, Peter M DiBattiste, Carolyn H McCabe, C Michael Gibson, Christopher P Cannon, Eugene Braunwald

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00521976 (An Investigation of Activated Factor XII), which is not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
26.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00521976 completednot on this map

An Investigation of Activated Factor XII (Fxlla) as a Prognostic Marker.

TypeobservationalSponsorHelse Stavanger HFRan2002 to 2005Enrolled871ConditionsChest Pain, Coronary Artery Disease, Unstable Angina Pectoris, Myocardial Infarction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 421 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Serum NT-pro-BNP Levels Predict Cardiovascular Events in Acromegaly Patients.Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David A MorrowCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. dmorrow@partners.org
James A de Lemos
Marc S Sabatine
Sabina A Murphy
Laura A Demopoulos
Peter M DiBattiste
Carolyn H McCabe
C Michael Gibson
Christopher P Cannon
Eugene Braunwald
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University Press · USUnited States Military Academy · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was designed to evaluate B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for risk assessment and clinical decision making over a range of cut points, alone and with cardiac troponin I (cTnI), in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

backgroundB-type natriuretic peptide holds promise for risk stratification. Additional evidence regarding optimal decision limits, use in combination with troponin, and use in targeting therapy is needed before acceptance into clinical use for ACS.

methodsWe evaluated BNP at baseline in 1,676 patients with non-ST-elevation ACS randomized to early invasive versus conservative management.

resultsPatients with elevated BNP (>80 pg/ml; n = 320) were at higher risk of death at seven days (2.5% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.006) and six months (8.4% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.0001). The association between BNP and mortality at six months (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 6.3) was independent of important clinical predictors, including cTnI and congestive heart failure (CHF). Patients with elevated BNP had a fivefold higher risk of developing new CHF by 30 days (5.9% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.0001). B-type natriuretic peptide added prognostic information to cTnI, discriminating patients at higher mortality risk among those with negative (OR 6.9; 95% CI 1.9 to 25.8) and positive (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.9 to 9.0) baseline cTnI results. No difference was observed in the effect of invasive versus conservative management when stratified by baseline levels of BNP (p(interaction) > or = 0.6).

conclusionsElevated BNP (>80 pg/ml) at presentation identifies patients with non-ST-elevation ACS who are at higher risk of death and CHF and adds incremental information to cTnI. Additional work is needed to identify therapies that may reduce the risk associated with increased BNP.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngina, UnstableAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkersCardiotonic AgentsFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPredictive Value of TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkersCardiotonic AgentsNatriuretic Peptide, Brain

Identifiers

PMID12706919
OpenAlexW2106709122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.