ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2003
Selective COX-2 inhibitors: a health economic perspective.
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- HEE-GER: a systematic review of German economic evaluations of health care published 1990-2004.BMC health services research · 2007Pooled it
- Encouraging physician appropriate prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapies: protocol of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN43532635].BMC health services research · 2004Trial
- The economics of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease - a systematic review of economic evaluations.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. However, due to gastrointestinal side effects, the health-related and economic burden related to these drugs is considerable. Therefore, substituting or supplementing conventional NSAIDs with safer drugs that have a better risk profile not only may avoid serious complications but may also be an efficient allocation of scarce resources. Because of their better gastrointestinal risk profile, the newly developed selective COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib are discussed as cost-effective alternatives to common NSAIDs. This paper provides an overview of health economic evaluations, conducted during the last few years, that investigate the economic consequences of switching patients from traditional NSAIDs to selective COX-2 inhibitors. This review of the health economic literature shows that results of the health economic assessments of COX-2 inhibitors are highly contradictory. The main divergence between studies occurs in estimated economic consequences of adopting COX-2 inhibitors in patients at low or average risk for developing gastrointestinal side effects. The economic consequences of the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors as well as the asynchronous development of scientific acceptance of the benefit of the new drugs and their actual diffusion and spread are discussed taking a broader, healthcare-system perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12705064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.