Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12705064›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2003

Selective COX-2 inhibitors: a health economic perspective.

David L B Schwappach, Christian M Koeck

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David L B SchwappachLehrstuhl für Gesundheitspolitik und -management, Fakultät der Medizin, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany. dlb@h-ero.de
Christian M Koeck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. However, due to gastrointestinal side effects, the health-related and economic burden related to these drugs is considerable. Therefore, substituting or supplementing conventional NSAIDs with safer drugs that have a better risk profile not only may avoid serious complications but may also be an efficient allocation of scarce resources. Because of their better gastrointestinal risk profile, the newly developed selective COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib are discussed as cost-effective alternatives to common NSAIDs. This paper provides an overview of health economic evaluations, conducted during the last few years, that investigate the economic consequences of switching patients from traditional NSAIDs to selective COX-2 inhibitors. This review of the health economic literature shows that results of the health economic assessments of COX-2 inhibitors are highly contradictory. The main divergence between studies occurs in estimated economic consequences of adopting COX-2 inhibitors in patients at low or average risk for developing gastrointestinal side effects. The economic consequences of the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors as well as the asynchronous development of scientific acceptance of the benefit of the new drugs and their actual diffusion and spread are discussed taking a broader, healthcare-system perspective.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalArthritis, RheumatoidCost SavingsCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDrug CostsGermanyHumansIsoenzymesMembrane ProteinsNational Health ProgramsOsteoarthritisPeptic UlcerProstaglandin-Endoperoxide SynthasesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsIsoenzymesMembrane ProteinsProstaglandin-Endoperoxide SynthasesPTGS2 protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.