ArticleGenetics2003
Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neanderthal introgressed ancestry reveals human genomic regions enriched with recessive deleterious mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Revisiting Dominance in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Obstruction of adaptation in diploids by recessive, strongly deleterious alleles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- The dominance effect of the adaptive transposable element insertion Bari-Jheh depends on the genetic background.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
- Inferring the strength of selection in Drosophila under complex demographic models.Molecular biology and evolution · 2009Article
- Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2006Article
- Gene action of new mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.Genetics · 2006Article
- The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.Genetics · 2005Article
- Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.Genetics · 2004Article
- Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2004Article
- Article
- Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There have been several attempts to estimate the average dominance (ratio of heterozygous to homozygous effects) of spontaneous deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, but these have given inconsistent results. We investigated whether transposable element (TE) insertions have higher average dominance for egg-to-adult viability than do point mutations, a possibility suggested by the types of fitness-depressing effects that TEs are believed to have. If so, then variation in dominance estimates among strains and crosses would be expected as a consequence of variation in TE activity. As a first test, we estimated the average dominance of all mutations and of copia insertions in a set of lines that had accumulated spontaneous mutations for 33 generations. A traditional regression method gave a dominance estimate for all mutations of 0.17, whereas average dominance of copia insertions was 0.51; the difference between these two estimates approached significance (P = 0.08). As a second test, we reanalyzed Ohnishi 1974 data on dominance of spontaneous and EMS-induced mutations. Because a considerable fraction of spontaneous mutations are caused by TE insertions, whereas EMS induces mainly point mutations, we predicted that average dominance would decline with increasing EMS concentration. This pattern was observed, but again fell short of formal significance (P = 0.07). Taken together, however, the two results give modest support for the hypothesis that TE insertions have greater average dominance in their viability effects than do point mutations, possibly as a result of deleterious effects of expression of TE-encoded genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.