Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12702680›Full record

ArticleGenetics2003

Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

James D Fry, Sergey V Nuzhdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Revisiting Dominance in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  3. Obstruction of adaptation in diploids by recessive, strongly deleterious alleles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James D FryDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA. jfry@mail.rochester.edu
Sergey V Nuzhdin

Funding

Quantitative genomics of sexual dimorphismR24GM065513 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2002 to 2005
$1.5M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI RELATED TO DROSOPHILA SPECIATIONR01GM061773 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2000 to 2004
$633k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM61773-01NIGMS NIH HHS 1R24GM65513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been several attempts to estimate the average dominance (ratio of heterozygous to homozygous effects) of spontaneous deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, but these have given inconsistent results. We investigated whether transposable element (TE) insertions have higher average dominance for egg-to-adult viability than do point mutations, a possibility suggested by the types of fitness-depressing effects that TEs are believed to have. If so, then variation in dominance estimates among strains and crosses would be expected as a consequence of variation in TE activity. As a first test, we estimated the average dominance of all mutations and of copia insertions in a set of lines that had accumulated spontaneous mutations for 33 generations. A traditional regression method gave a dominance estimate for all mutations of 0.17, whereas average dominance of copia insertions was 0.51; the difference between these two estimates approached significance (P = 0.08). As a second test, we reanalyzed Ohnishi 1974 data on dominance of spontaneous and EMS-induced mutations. Because a considerable fraction of spontaneous mutations are caused by TE insertions, whereas EMS induces mainly point mutations, we predicted that average dominance would decline with increasing EMS concentration. This pattern was observed, but again fell short of formal significance (P = 0.07). Taken together, however, the two results give modest support for the hypothesis that TE insertions have greater average dominance in their viability effects than do point mutations, possibly as a result of deleterious effects of expression of TE-encoded genes.

Indexed as

Genes, DominantMutationAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMalePeptide HydrolasesRetroelementsCopia protein, DrosophilaDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID12702680
PMCPMC1462516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.