ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2003
Expression of CD80 on Kupffer cells is enhanced in cadaveric liver transplants.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mononuclear phagocyte system in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Human Liver Macrophage Subsets Defined by CD32.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Mononuclear phagocyte system in hepatitis C virus infection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Constitutive androstane receptor agonist, TCPOBOP, attenuates steatohepatitis in the methionine choline-deficient diet-fed mouse.World journal of gastroenterology · 2007Article
- Isolation of Kupffer cells and their suppressive effects on T lymphocyte growth in rat orthotopic liver transplantation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In experimental animals inhibition of T cell co-stimulation immediately after organ transplantation effectively prevents rejection. We investigated whether the expression of co-stimulatory molecules is enhanced in cadaveric liver transplants, whether their expression is influenced by the transplantation procedure, and whether variation in expression between liver transplants is related to the occurrence of acute rejection. Expression of CD80, CD86 and the macrophage marker CD68 were determined by immunohistochemistry in biopsies from 40 clinical liver transplants obtained at different time-points during the transplantation procedure, and in normal liver tissue obtained from 10 human livers. Expression of CD80 and CD86 on Kupffer cells was graded by comparison with CD68-staining. In a subgroup CD80 and CD86 mRNA was quantified by real-time detection polymerase chain reaction. CD86 was expressed in all liver transplants and normal livers on the majority of Kupffer cells. CD80 was absent or sporadically expressed in normal liver tissue, but in 18 of 40 liver transplants at least one-quarter of Kupffer cells expressed CD80. CD80- and CD86-mRNA and protein expression in liver transplants did not change during the warm ischaemic and reperfusion phases of the transplantation procedure. CD80-expression on Kupffer cells varied strongly between individual donor livers; this variation was, however, not significantly related to the occurrence of acute rejection after transplantation. In conclusion, in nearly half of cold-preserved cadaveric liver transplants an increased proportion of Kupffer cells express CD80 at the time of transplantation in comparison with normal liver tissue. The expression was not further induced by warm ischaemia and reperfusion. However, the observed variation in CD80-expression between liver transplants is not a accurate predictive measure for acute rejection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.