Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12699400›Full record

ReviewDrugs2003

Invasive oesophageal candidiasis: current and developing treatment options.

Jose A Vazquez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis: Current Updates.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Will resistance in fungi emerge on a scale similar to that seen in bacteria?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2008
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Anidulafungin.Drugs · 2004
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose A VazquezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. jvazquez@intmed.wayne.edu
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal candidiasis is frequently one of the first signs of HIV infection, and a marker of HIV disease. Approximately 10% of patients with AIDS or other immunodeficiency, whether due to an underlying disease, chemotherapy or radiation therapy, will experience oesophageal candidiasis during their lifetime. In addition, unless the underlying immunodeficiency is corrected, approximately 60% of patients will experience a relapse within 6 months of the initial infection. The systemic azoles have gradually replaced the use of amphotericin B for oesophageal candidiasis, and are generally safely used and effective agents for this infection. A concern in some of these patients is the appearance of antifungal-refractory oesophageal candidiasis, which frequently leads to a vicious cycle of poor oral intake, weight loss, malnutrition and wasting syndrome, with occasional mortality due to malnutrition. Newer antifungals such as voriconazole and caspofungin, which are more potent in vitro and have a broader spectrum of activity, including activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida species are a welcome addition to the antifungal armamentarium that may be used in the management of refractory mucosal candidiasis.

Indexed as

AIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisEsophageal DiseasesHumansAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID12699400
OpenAlexW1999835913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.