Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12696993›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2003

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in osteoporosis: do they reduce the risk of fracture?

Raymond G Schlienger, Christoph R Meier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Age-dependent effects of atorvastatin on biochemical bone turnover markers: a randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2004
    Trial
  3. Heart Failure and Osteoporosis: Shared Challenges in the Aging Population.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Raymond G SchliengerBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. schliengerr@uhbs.ch
Christoph R Meier
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis affects a large number of people in industrialised countries. It has clinical and public-health impacts, most importantly due to subsequent fractures. Osteoporotic fractures are one of the most common causes of disability and are associated with enormous healthcare expenditure. The majority of existing treatment options for osteoporosis only inhibit bone resorption and prevent excessive bone loss but are not capable of stimulating bone formation. However, several recent in vitro and in vivo studies in animals demonstrated that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors stimulate the production of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2), which is a potent regulating protein in osteoblast differentiation and activity. This suggests that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may have an anabolic effect on bones, making them a potentially interesting treatment option for osteoporosis. Additionally, several studies in humans showed that some HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may have a beneficial effect on bone turnover and may lead to an increase in bone mineral density. Consequently, several observational studies tried to evaluate whether use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is associated with a decreased risk of fractures. Even though not all results of these epidemiological studies, using different designs in different study populations, were entirely consistent, they provided substantial evidence that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use may decrease the bone fracture risk by approximately 50%. On the other hand, reanalysis of two randomised controlled trials of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy, designed to assess cardiovascular outcomes, could not show that patients treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors had a lower fracture risk in comparison with placebo-treated patients. Therefore, to conclusively assess the potential of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, randomised controlled trials need to be performed to address this conflicting issue. Until the results of such trials are available, practitioners should prescribe the drugs that have been proven to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone DensityCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicFractures, BoneHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOsteoporosisRiskHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID12696993
OpenAlexW330167029

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.