Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2003
Three subsequent single doses of gadolinium chelate for brain MR imaging in multiple sclerosis.
Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of ionic and non-ionic paramagnetic contrast media on brain bio-electric activity.Neuroradiology · 2005Trial
- Nanotechnology-based drug delivery for the treatment of CNS disorders.Translational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Cumulative Dose of Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Improves Detection of Enhancing Lesions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Article
- The value of chemical fat-saturation pulse added to T1-weighted spin-echo sequence in evaluating gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions in multiple sclerosis.La Radiologia medica · 2007Article
- Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiologyReview
- Cerebral lesions of multiple sclerosis: is gadolinium always irreplaceable in assessing lesion activity?Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeA triple-dose (TD) of gadolinium chelate is highly sensitive approach for detecting lesion activity in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, individual TD injections do not provide data on the severity of the pathologic process in a population of lesions, and its clinical use is limited by the cost-benefit considerations. Our aim was to determine whether the use of three subsequent single doses (SD) of a gadolinium chelate in brain MR imaging is useful in detecting MS lesions with different patterns of enhancement.
methodsIn 10 patients, T1-weighted spin-echo images were acquired before and after three intravenous administrations of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadodiamide.
resultsIn all patients, SD images showed six enhancing lesions; double-dose (DD) images, 13; and TD images, 22. Differences between SD and TD and between DD and TD were significant (P <.018). Six lesions (27%) enhanced with all the three doses; seven (32%), with both DD and TD; and nine (41%), with only TD. Proportions of patients with at least one enhancing lesion were, for SD, four of 10; DD, seven of 10; and TD, nine of 10. In defining active disease in these nine patients, we needed only 19 SDs versus the 30 SDs that would have been needed if individual TD injections were used.
conclusionWith three subsequent SD injections, the number of enhancing lesions progressively increases. This approach allows the distinction of three levels of enhancement, and it reduces the amount of contrast agent needed to distinguish patients with active MS from those with nonactive MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12695199PMC8148674W2141059554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.