ArticleJournal of human hypertension2003
Repeated measures of blood pressure and correlations between systolic pressure, pulse pressure and LV mass: a circular debate?
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraindividual temporal variance of biomarkers and the definition of individualized prognosis in cardiovascular patients.Journal of human hypertension · 2006Article
- Emergence of structural arterial stiffness in diabetes and the role of abnormalities of autonomic tone in the sequence of events.Journal of human hypertension · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This month's edition of the Journal contains an interesting contribution from Mule and colleagues from Palermo. The structure of the piece is very simple relating ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measures for systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure to LV mass in hypertensive patients. The technique employed is linear correlation analysis. Pulse pressure is an area of interest of many of the readers, contributors and editorial board of the Journal. This is not a new area nor is this a new approach. The strategy of deriving biological inference from such data relevant to the individual by correlation analysis from a population sample deserves a closer and broader comment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12692565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.