Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12690475›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2003

Preventive surgery for colon cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Gabriela Möslein, Steffen Pistorius, Hans-Detlev Saeger, Hans K Schackert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Preventive surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis coli].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2005
    Review
  5. Surveillance in Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2005
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriela MösleinKlinik für Allgemeine und Unfallchirurgie, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. moeslein@uni-duesseldorf.de
Steffen Pistorius
Hans-Detlev Saeger
Hans K Schackert
TU Dresden · DEAllgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt · ATKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA better understanding of the molecular basis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has profound consequences for both the diagnosis and (prophylactic) treatment of (pre)malignant neoplastic lesions. DISCUSSION: Sequence analysis of the underlying genes for these conditions and the detection of disease-causing genetic alterations in an index patient enable predictive testing for individuals at risk within an affected family. However, the clinical implications of predictive molecular testing depend on the overall penetrance and variability in the expression of pathogenic mutations. The extent of these parameters differs considerably among the various known hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Hence the integration of genetic information into the daily surgical practice remains challenging.

conclusionsThis review provides an update on the indications for family assessment, purpose and limitations of the genetic testing and resulting recommendations for prophylactic surgery in FAP and HNPCC.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiColectomyColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansSigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID12690475
OpenAlexW1533904499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.