Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12690453›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2003

Hox gene survey in the chaetognath Spadella cephaloptera: evolutionary implications.

Daniel Papillon, Yvan Perez, Laurent Fasano, Yannick Le Parco, Xavier Caubit

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dorsoventral decoupling of Hox gene expression underpins the diversification of molluscs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The mitochondrial genome of Paraspadella gotoi is highly reduced and reveals that chaetognaths are a sister group to protostomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel PapillonCentre d'Océanologie de Marseille, UMR 6540 CNRS DIMAR, Rue batterie des lions, 13007, Marseille, France. papillon@com.univ-mrs.fr
Yvan Perez
Laurent Fasano
Yannick Le Parco
Xavier Caubit
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Biologie du Développement Marseille · FRStation Marine d'Endoume · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the isolation of six Hox genes in the chaetognath Spadella cephaloptera. We identified one member of the paralogy group 3, four median genes and a mosaic gene that shares features of both median and posterior classes ( SceMedPost). Several hypotheses may account for the presence of a mosaic Hox gene in this animal. Here we propose that SceMedPost may represent an ancestral gene, which has not diverged totally into a posterior or a median one. This hypothesis has interesting implications for the reconstruction of the evolutionary history of Hox genes and suggests that Chaetognatha lineage divergence could predate the deuterostome/protostome split. Such a phylogenetic position is considered in the light of their embryological and morphological characters.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsDNA PrimersFranceGenes, HomeoboxInvertebratesModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID12690453
OpenAlexW1534235800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.