ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2003
Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of recombinant human erythropoietins in doping control.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2019Trial
- The promise and predicament of cosmetic neurology.Journal of medical ethics · 2006Review
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of recombinant human erythropoietin in athletes : a population approach.Clinical drug investigation · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is: (i) to compare recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) pharmacokinetics in athletes and healthy individuals; and (ii) to report pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies performed in athletes. Effect parameters in PK/PD studies included: (i) red blood cell variables (haematocrit, reticulocyte count); and (ii) markers of iron metabolism (serum soluble transferrin receptors [sTfR], ferritin [fr] and sTfR : fr ratio). To understand the choice of these markers, we first performed a brief review of the pharmacological effects of rHuEPO. Few studies have been conducted in healthy individuals and there are minimal references concerning pharmacokinetics in athletes. A 'flip-flop' phenomenon was noted after subcutaneous administration. The pharmacokinetics appeared linear from 50-1000 U/kg, but this linearity was not observed at the lowest dose of 10 U/kg. A negative-feedback loop of endogenous erythropoietin production occurred at the end of treatment. The half-life of the terminal part of the curves seemed to be slightly higher in athletes (36-42 vs 32 hours) than in untrained individuals and total clearance tended to be greater (17.5 vs 6.5 mL/h/kg). In conclusion, more investigations are needed to better understand the relationship between rHuEPO administration and changes in haematological and iron-metabolism parameters in athletes, particularly after chronic low-dose administration of rHuEPO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.