Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12687416›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2003

In vitro antibacterial activity and pharmacodynamics of new quinolones.

A Dalhoff, F-J Schmitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sitafloxacin in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2013
    Article
  13. Microbial transformations of antimicrobial quinolones and related drugs.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2012
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Global fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology and implictions for clinical use.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A DalhoffInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Brunswiker Strasse 4, 24105 Kiel, Germany. axel.dalhoff.ad@bayer-ag.de
F-J Schmitz
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This synopsis of published literature summarises data on the in vitro antibacterial activity and pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones. Data were compiled for ciprofloxacin, levofloxcin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, gemifloxacin, trovafloxacin, sitafloxacin and garenoxacin. All of these quinolones are almost equipotent against gram-negative bacteria but demonstrate improved activity against gram-positive species. The new quinolones are uniformly active against gram-positive species except Streptococcus pneumoniae; against which gemifloxacin, sitafloxacin and garenoxacin are one to two dilution steps more active than moxifloxacin. All of the new quinolones except gemifloxacin demonstrate enhanced activity against anaerobes. Since all the new quinolones show similar activity against the major respiratory tract pathogens except Streptococcus pneumoniae and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics will be clinically relevant differentiators and determinants of their overall activity and efficacy. In vitro simulations of serum concentrations revealed that (i). gemifloxacin and levofloxacin were significantly and gatifloxacin moderately less active than moxifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, and (ii). resistant subpopulations emerged following exposure to levofloxacin and gatifloxacin (gemifloxacin not yet published) but not to moxifloxacin. The emergence of resistance is a function of drug concentrations achievable in vivo and the susceptibility pattern of the target organisms. Therefore, the use of less potent fluoroquinolones with borderline or even suboptimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate parameters will inadvertently foster the development of class resistance. Drugs with the most favourable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics should be used as first-line agents in order to preserve the potential of this drug class and, most importantly, to provide the patient with an optimally effective regimen.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, BacterialFluoroquinolonesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID12687416
OpenAlexW2150886173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.