Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12684844›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics2003

PCR analysis of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-purified plastid DNA, a sensitive tool to judge the hetero-/homoplastomic status of plastid transformants.

Magdalena Swiatek, Stephan Greiner, Sabine Kemp, Anja Drescher, Hans-Ulrich Koop, Reinhold G Herrmann, Rainer M Maier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants: Essential Principles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena SwiatekDepartment für Biologie I, Bereich Botanik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Strasse 67, 80638 München, Germany.
Stephan Greiner
Sabine Kemp
Anja Drescher
Hans-Ulrich Koop
Reinhold G Herrmann
Rainer M Maier
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic transformation of plastids of higher plants has developed into a powerful approach for both basic research and biotechnology. Due to the high copy number of the plastid genome per plastid and per cell, repeated cycles of shoot regeneration under conditions selective for the modified plastid chromosome are required to obtain transformants entirely lacking wild-type plastid genomes. The presence of promiscuous plastid DNA in nuclear and/or mitochondrial genomes that generally contaminate even gradient-purified plastid fractions reduces the applicability of the highly sensitive PCR approach to monitor the absence of residual wild-type plastid chromosomes in transformed lines. It is therefore difficult, or even impossible, to assess reliably the hetero- or homoplastomic state of plastid transformants in this manner. By analysing wild-type and transplastomic mutants of tobacco, we demonstrate that separation of plastid chromosomes isolated from gradient-purified plastid fractions by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis can overcome the problem of (co)amplification of interfering promiscuous plastid DNA. PCR analyses with primers specific for plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear genes reveal an impressive purity of such plastid DNA fractions at a detection limit of less than one wild-type plastid chromosome copy per ten transplastomic cells.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNADNAElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGene Transfer TechniquesNicotianaPlastidsPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA

Identifiers

PMID12684844
OpenAlexW1526698318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.