ReviewChromosoma2003
Chromosomal proteins in the spermatogenesis of Drosophila.
Review in Chromosoma, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell profiling of Anopheles gambiae spermatogenesis defines the onset of meiotic silencing and premeiotic overexpression of the X chromosome.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Imaging centrosomes in fly testes.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2013Article
- Detection of the Wolbachia-encoded DNA binding protein, HU beta, in mosquito gonads.Insect biochemistry and molecular biology · 2013Article
- Expression of ribosomal protein L22e family members in Drosophila melanogaster: rpL22-like is differentially expressed and alternatively spliced.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Triplex configuration in the nick-free DNAs that constitute the chromosomal scaffolds in grasshopper spermatids.Chromosoma · 2008Article
- Article
- Replacement by Drosophila melanogaster protamines and Mst77F of histones during chromatin condensation in late spermatids and role of sesame in the removal of these proteins from the male pronucleus.Molecular and cellular biology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatin constitution in the male germ line of Drosophila is discussed with respect to the substitution of somatic histones by protamines or other basic proteins. The specific properties of germ line chromatin include the initiation and completion of the spermatogenic pathway and the reprogramming of the genome for embryonic development. During meiotic prophase cell cycle-regulated H3 histones appear to a large extent to be substituted by the histone H3.3 replacement variant protein, which is generally found associated with transcriptionally active chromatin. Condensation of the chromosomes during meiosis and the subsequent compaction for packaging in the sperm head require suitable proteins, but the cell cycle-regulated histones are not available as their expression is limited to S-phase. It is, therefore, proposed that any basic protein with a limited range of sequence requirements may take over this packaging function. Suitable proteins may have evolved by divergence from histone variants not restricted in their expression to S-phase, similar to the testes-predominant histone H3.3A of Drosophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.