ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2003
Using analytical ultracentrifugation to study compositional variation in vertebrate genomes.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulating metagenomic stable isotope probing datasets with MetaSIPSim.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- SIPSim: A Modeling Toolkit to Predict Accuracy and Aid Design of DNA-SIP Experiments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Using prior knowledge in the determination of macromolecular size-distributions by analytical ultracentrifugation.Biomacromolecules · 2007Article
- GC content evolution of the human and mouse genomes: insights from the study of processed pseudogenes in regions of different recombination rates.Journal of molecular evolution · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although much attention has recently been directed to analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), the revival of interest has hardly addressed the applications of this technology in genome analysis, and the extent to which AUC studies can quickly and effectively complement modern sequence-based analyses of genomes, e.g. by anticipating, extending or checking results that can be obtained by cloning and sequencing. In particular, AUC yields a quick overview of the base compositional structure of a species' genome even if no DNA sequences are available and the species is unlikely to be sequenced in the near future. The link between AUC and DNA sequences dates back to 1959, when a precise linear relation was discovered between the GC (guanine+cytosine) level of DNA fragments and their buoyant density in CsCl as measured at sedimentation equilibrium. A 24-hour AUC run of a high molecular weight sample of a species' total DNA already yields the GC distribution of its genome. AUC methods based on this principle remain sensitive tools in the age of genomics, and can now be fine-tuned by comparing CsCl absorbance profiles with the corresponding sequence histograms. The CsCl profiles of vertebrates allow insight into structural and functional properties that correlate with base composition, and their changes during vertebrate evolution can be monitored by comparing CsCl profiles of different taxa. Such comparisons also allow consistency checks of phylogenetic hypotheses at different taxonomic levels. We here discuss some of the information that can be deduced from CsCl profiles, with emphasis on mammalian DNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.