ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2003
Differences in troglitazone action on glucose metabolism in freshly isolated vs long-term incubated rat skeletal muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Exposure of isolated skeletal muscle to troglitazone has resulted in inconsistent findings ranging from inhibition to stimulation of fuel oxidation and the glycogenic pathway. To better understand such variation in outcome, the present study used isolated rat soleus muscle strips to examine the interdependent influences of prolonged maintenance in vitro and of troglitazone exposure. 2. If freshly isolated muscle strips were exposed to troglitazone (1 micro mol l(-1)) for 24 h, glucose oxidation was markedly reduced (-26+/-1%, P<0.0001), whereas glycogen synthesis remained unaffected (+9+/-7%, n.s.). 3. In contrast, extended exposure to troglitazone for 72 h increased both glucose oxidation (+65+/-28%, P<0.05) and glycogen synthesis (+46+/-11%, P<0.005), and a similar stimulatory effect was also observed in muscles exposed to troglitazone only during the last 24 h of their 72 h preincubation period (glucose oxidation: +61+/-15%, P<0.001; glycogen synthesis: +43+/-15%, P<0.01). 4. Troglitazone thus stimulated glucose utilization in long-term incubated muscle independent of the duration of exposure (24 or 72 h), whereas it inhibited glucose utilization in freshly isolated muscle. 5. The observed differences in troglitazone action on freshly isolated vs long-term incubated muscle suggest that findings on muscle tissue subject to prolonged maintenance in vitro cannot be extrapolated to native muscle in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.