Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12682630›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2003

Characteristics of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with additional chromosomal abnormality: concomitant trisomy 4 may constitute a distinctive subtype of t(8;21) AML.

K Nishii, E Usui, N Katayama, F Lorenzo, K Nakase, T Kobayashi, H Miwa, M Mizutani, I Tanaka, K Nasu and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Acute myeloid leukemia with variant t(8;10;21).Leukemia research reports · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

K NishiiSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
E Usui
N Katayama
F Lorenzo
K Nakase
T Kobayashi
H Miwa
M Mizutani
I Tanaka
K Nasu
H Dohy
T Kyo
M Taniwaki
T Ueda
K Kita
H Shiku
Mie University · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JPAichi Medical University · JPIse Red Cross Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Hiroshima College of Nursing · JPKobe Kaisei Hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPShinKokura Hospital · JPUniversity of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

t(8;21)(q22;q22) is the most frequently observed karyotypic abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially in FAB M2. Clinically, this type of AML often shows eosinophilia and has a high complete remission rate with conventional chemotherapy. t(8;21) AML is also frequently associated with additional karyotypic aberrations, such as a loss of the sex chromosome; however, it is unclear whether these aberrations change the biological and clinical characteristics of t(8;21) AML. To investigate this issue, 94 patients with t(8;21) AML were categorized according to their additional karyotypic aberrations, which were detected in more than three cases, and then morphologic features, phenotypes, expression of cytokine receptors, and clinical features were compared to t(8;21) AML without other additional aberrant karyotypes. t(8;21) AML with loss of the sex chromosome and abnormality of chromosome 9 were found in 27 cases (29.3%) and 10 cases (10.6%), respectively; however, no differences were observed from the t(8;21) AML without other additional karyotypes in terms of morphological and phenotypic features. There was also no significant difference in the clinical outcome among these three groups. On the other hand, trisomy 4 was found in three cases (3.2%) and these cells showed low expressions of CD19 (P=0.06) and IL-7 receptor (P=0.05), and high expressions of CD33 (P=0.13), CD18 (P=0.03), and CD56 (P=0.03) when compared to t(8;21) AML without additional karyotypes. Moreover, all three t(8;21) AML cases with trisomy 4 did not show eosinophilia in their bone marrow and died within 2.4 years. These observations suggest that additional karyotypic aberration, t(8;21) with trisomy 4 is rare, but it may constitute a distinctive subtype of t(8;21) AML.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4Translocation, GeneticTrisomyAdolescentAgedAntigens, CD19Antigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitFlow CytometryHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceJapanAML1-ETO fusion protein, humanAntigens, CD19Antigens, NeoplasmCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitNeoplasm ProteinsOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptors, Interleukin-7RUNX1 Translocation Partner 1 ProteinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12682630
OpenAlexW2033356346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.