ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Clinical evaluation of two methods for genotyping hepatitis C virus based on analysis of the 5' noncoding region.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- On leveraging self-supervised learning for accurate HCV genotyping.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of Three Different Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping Methods: 5'NCR PCR-RFLP, Core Type-Specific PCR, and NS5b Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2017Article
- Clinical Laboratory Testing in the Era of Directly Acting Antiviral Therapies for Hepatitis C.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- Characterization of Samples Identified as Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 without Subtype by Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II Assay Using the New Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO Test.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Update on hepatitis B and C virus diagnosis.World journal of virology · 2015Review
- Hepatitis B and C virus infections among patients with end stage renal disease in a low-resourced hemodialysis center in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Molecular Assay and Genotyping of Hepatitis C Virus among Infected Egyptian and Saudi Arabian Patients.Virology : research and treatment · 2015Article
- Hepatitis C virus genotyping methods: evaluation of AmpliSens(®) HCV-1/2/3-FRT compared to sequencing method.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2014Article
- Advances in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Gastroenterology research · 2013Review
- Sequencing assays for failed genotyping with the versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA), version 2.0.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Article
- Development and Application of an In-house Line Probe Assay for Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping.Hepatitis monthly · 2013Article
- Hepatitis C Virus NS5B Sequence-Based Genotyping Analysis of Patients From the Sharkia Governorate, Egypt.Hepatitis monthly · 2013Article
- Comparative performance evaluation of hepatitis C virus genotyping based on the 5' untranslated region versus partial sequencing of the NS5B region of brazilian patients with chronic hepatitis C.Virology journal · 2011Article
- Hepatitis C virus genotypes in clinical specimens tested at a national reference testing laboratory in the United States.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
- Correlation of the 5'untranslated region (5'UTR) and non-structural 5B (NS5B) nucleotide sequences in hepatitis C virus subtyping.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2010Article
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 subtype identification in new HCV drug development and future clinical practice.PloS one · 2009Article
- HCV genotyping using statistical classification approach.Journal of biomedical science · 2009Article
- Evaluation of Versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Evaluation of a new assay in comparison with reverse hybridization and sequencing methods for hepatitis C virus genotyping targeting both 5' noncoding and nonstructural 5b genomic regions.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the performance characteristics of a standardized direct sequencing method (TRUGENE HCV 5'NC; Visible Genetics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and a reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HCV II; Bayer Corp., Tarrytown, N.Y.) for genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Both methods are based on detection of sequence heterogeneity in the 5' noncoding (5'NC) region. Concordance between the genotyping methods was assessed by testing 172 samples representing the six major genotypes. Sequence analysis of the more phylogenetically informative nonstructural 5B (NS5B) region was also done with 148 (86%) samples to confirm the accuracy of and resolve discrepancies between the 5'NC genotyping results. The sensitivities of the methods were assessed by using the 5'NC amplicon from both the qualitative and quantitative AMPLICOR HCV tests (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.). The ability of the methods to detect mixed-genotype infections was determined with mixtures of two different genotypes at relative concentrations ranging from 1 to 50%. Both 5'NC methods were able to genotype 99.4% of the samples with type agreement for 99.5% and subtype agreement for 68.2% of the samples. No or ambiguous subtype results were found by the line probe assay for 16.5% and by the TRUGENE 5'NC test for 17.1% of the samples. Discrepancies occurred between the line probe assay and NS5B results at the type level for 1.4% of the samples and at the subtype level for 14.2% of the samples. Discrepancies also occurred between the TRUGENE 5'NC and NS5B results at the type level for 2% of the samples and at the subtype level for 8.1% of the samples. We also found two distinct strains of HCV classified as type 2 by analysis of the 5'NC region that were type 1 by analysis of the NS5B region. The sensitivities of the two 5'NC genotyping methods were comparable and dependent on the amplification test used ( approximately 10(3) IU/ml with the qualitative HCV RNA tests and approximately 10(5) IU/ml with the quantitative HCV RNA tests). Genotype mixtures were successfully identified at a relative concentration of 5% by the line probe assay and 10% by the TRUGENE 5'NC test. In conclusion, the performance characteristics of the 5'NC methods were similar and both methods produced accurate results at the genotype level but neither method should be used for subtyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.