Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12682127›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1,586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by Broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods: report from the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001.

M A Pfaller, D J Diekema, S A Messer, L Boyken, R J Hollis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Voriconazole Activity AgainstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Antifungal Testing of VaginalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Selection of Ethanol Tolerant Strains ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antifungal activity of liriodenine on agents of systemic mycoses, with emphasis on the genusThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  13. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Candida parapsilosis: from Genes to the Bedside.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  16. An Update on the Roles of Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current medical mycology · 2016
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M A PfallerDepartment of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine and College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
D J Diekema
S A Messer
L Boyken
R J Hollis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program (ARTEMIS Program) was initiated in 2001 to provide focused surveillance of the activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against Candida spp. isolated from blood and other normally sterile sites. A total of 1,586 episodes of infection were detected at 61 international study sites. Overall, 57.7% of the infections were due to Candida albicans, followed by C. glabrata (14.8%), C. parapsilosis (12.5%), C. tropicalis (9.4%), C. krusei (2.7%), and C. lusitaniae (1.5%). Isolates of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were all highly susceptible to fluconazole (for 99% of the isolates the MICs were <or=8 microg/ml). Likewise, 99 to 100% of these species were inhibited by <or=1 microg of voriconazole per ml. Voriconazole was also active against C. glabrata (93% of the isolates were susceptible [MICs <or= 1 microg/ml]) and C. krusei (100% of the isolates were susceptible). The agar-based Etest and disk diffusion methods performed well for the testing of both fluconazole and voriconazole compared to the broth microdilution MIC reference method. These observations establish the continued importance of C. albicans as a pathogen and the sustained activity of fluconazole and the broad spectrum of activity of voriconazole and will serve as the first-year benchmark for the ARTEMIS Program. Continued surveillance and refinement of broth- and agar-based test methods will help to identify susceptibility trends and improve the laboratory capability for antifungal susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPopulation SurveillancePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsFluconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID12682127
PMCPMC153922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.