ArticleAtencion primaria2003
[Research in primary care?].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Artificial intelligence-assisted qualitative analysis of healthcare professionals perception of research in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2025Article
- Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A) as a Predictor of Third Trimester Obesity: Insights from the CRIOBES Project.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024Article
- [Bibliometric map of research done in primary care in Spain during the period 2008-2012].Atencion primaria · 2014Article
- [Research within the reach of Osakidetza professionals: Primary Health Care Research Program].Atencion primaria · 2014Article
- [The scientific entertainer in primary health care].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Research and protection of personal data in Primary Care].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Concept maps as a tool for the diagnosis of rare diseases].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Documental review of community health promotion experiences in primary health care].Atencion primaria · 2011Review
- [Research in primary care: continue making progress].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
- [Clinical trials in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Organisational issues in implementing clinical trials in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Research in primary care: 1994-2003].Atencion primaria · 2005Review
- [Primary care research: are we doing what we should?].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [What impact did the papers at the last atención primaria congress in castilla-la mancha have?].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Primary Care research: attitudes and hindrances perceived by our doctors].Atencion primaria · 2004Article
- [Irrelevant research in primary care? Is clinical research used to generate evidence from practice?].Atencion primaria · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by[Authors reply].2003
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.