Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12680885›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2003

The pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in patients with impaired renal function.

Klemens Budde, Hans-Hellmut Neumayer, Lutz Fritsche, Wladyslaw Sulowicz, Tomasz Stompôr, David Eckland

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pioglitazone in diabetic kidney disease: forgotten but not gone.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pioglitazone, a PPAR-γ Activator, Stimulates BKFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  15. Therapeutic Considerations for Antihyperglycemic Agents in Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Toxicological evaluation of subchronic use of pioglitazone in mice.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Management of Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Kidney Disease.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Klemens BuddeDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Hans-Hellmut Neumayer
Lutz Fritsche
Wladyslaw Sulowicz
Tomasz Stompôr
David Eckland
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJagiellonian University · PLTakeda (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of pioglitazone and its metabolites M-III and M-IV with impaired renal function and normal renal function.

methodsIn a phase-I, open-label, parallel-group study, six healthy subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance> 80 ml min-1), nine patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30-60 ml min-1) and 12 patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml min-1) received single and multiple oral doses of pioglitazone 45 mg. The serum pharmacokinetic profiles of pioglitazone and its metabolites M-III and M-IV were assessed for the first and last dose administered (day 1 and day 12, respectively).

resultsPharmacokinetic data revealed no significant accumulation of pioglitazone or its metabolites M-III and M-IV in patients with renal impairment. There was no significant difference in the pharmacokinetic profile of pioglitazone in subjects with normal and with moderately impaired renal function. After single oral doses, mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values were decreased in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects with normal renal function for pioglitazone (13 476 vs 17 387, P = 0.371; -23%; confidence interval (CI) -57, 38), M-III metabolite (13 394 vs 15 071, P = 0.841; -11%; CI -74, 194) and M-IV metabolite (27 991 vs 49 856, P = 0.006; -44%; CI -62, -17). After repeated oral doses of pioglitazone, mean AUC values (microg.h l-1) were decreased in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects with normal renal function for pioglitazone (8744 vs 14,565, P = 0.004; -40%; CI -57, -16), M-III (3991 vs 7,289, P = 0.0009; -45%; CI -60, -25) and M-IV (21 080 vs 25 706, P = 0.181; -18%; CI 39, 10). The tolerability and safety profile of pioglitazone was comparable between groups.

conclusionsPioglitazone was well tolerated in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. Although mean serum concentrations of pioglitazone and its metabolites are increased in patients with severe renal impairment, adjustment of starting and maintenance doses in these patients is probably unwarranted.

Indexed as

ThiazolidinedionesAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHalf-LifeHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidney DiseasesMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedPioglitazoneThiazolesHypoglycemic AgentsPioglitazoneThiazolesThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID12680885
PMCPMC1884238
OpenAlexW1596678070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.