Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12679945›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2003

The influence of Enteral Nutrition in postoperative patients with poor liver function.

Qing-Gang Hu, Qi-Chang Zheng

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Nutritional support for liver disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Nutritional support treatment for severe chronic hepatitis and posthepatitic cirrhosis.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2006
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Liver - guardian, modifier and target of sepsis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Diagnosis of and therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2013
    Article
  15. Clinical review: The liver in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  16. Postoperative management after hepatic resection.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2012
    Article
  17. Parenteral nutrition in liver resection.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2012
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qing-Gang HuDepartment of Surgery, Xiehe hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province China. mailbox_1@163.net
Qi-Chang Zheng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the safety, rationality and the practicality of enteral nutritional (EN) support in the postoperative patients with damaged liver function and the protective effect of EN on the gut barrier.

methods135 patients with liver function of Child B or C grade were randomly allocated to enteral nutrition group (EN, 65 cases), total parenteral nutrition group (TPN, 40 cases) and control group (CON, 30 cases). Nutritional parameters, hepatic and kidney function indexes were measured at the day before operation, 5th and 10th day after the operation respectively. Comparison was made to evaluate the efficacy of different nutritional support. Urinary concentrations of lactulose(L) and mannitol(M) were measured by pulsed electrochemical detection(HPLC-PED) and the L/M ratio calculated to evaluate their effectiveness on protection of gut barrier.

resultsNo significant damages in hepatic and kidney function were observed in both EN and TPN groups between pre- and postoperatively. EN group was the earliest one reaching the positive nitrogen balance after operation and with the lowest loss of body weight and there was no change in L/M ratio after the operation (0.026+/-0.004) at the day 1 before operation, 0.030+/-0.004 at the day 5 postoperative and 0.027+/-0.005 at the day 10 postoperative), but the change in TPN group was significant at the day 5 postoperative (0.027+/-0.003 vs 0.038+/-0.009,P<0.01).

conclusionEN is a rational and effective method in patients with hepatic dysfunction after operation and has significant protection effect on the gut barrier.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionParenteral Nutrition, TotalPostoperative PeriodAdultCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaChronic DiseaseHumansLiver DiseasesLiver Function TestsLiver NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID12679945
PMCPMC4611462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.