Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12679514›Full record

ReviewQuality & safety in health care2003

Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care.

S M Gilbody, P M Whitty, J M Grimshaw, R E Thomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quality & safety in health care, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions to improve management of anxiety disorders in general practice: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Change in functioning outcomes as a predictor of the course of depression: a 12-month longitudinal study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S M GilbodyUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK. s.m.gilbody@leeds.ac.uk
P M Whitty
J M Grimshaw
R E Thomas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of screening and organisational strategies to improve the recognition and management of depression in primary care published in a recent issue of Effective Health Care is reviewed.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareDepressionHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID12679514
PMCPMC1743696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.