Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12678433›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes2002

Purification and characterization of the complex I from the respiratory chain of Rhodothermus marinus.

Andreia S Fernandes, Manuela M Pereira, Miguel Teixeira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rhodothermus marinus: physiology and molecular biology.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2006
    Review
  4. Respiratory chains from aerobic thermophilic prokaryotes.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreia S FernandesInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal.
Manuela M Pereira
Miguel Teixeira
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rotenone sensitive NADH:menaquinone oxidoreductase (NDH-I or complex I) from the thermohalophilic bacterium Rhodothermus marinus has been purified and characterized. Three of its subunits react with antibodies against 78, 51, and 21.3c kDa subunits of Neurospora crassa complex I. The optimum conditions for NADH dehydrogenase activity are 50 degrees C and pH 8.1, and the enzyme presents a KM of 9 microM for NADH. The enzyme also displays NADH:quinone oxidoreductase activity with two menaquinone analogs, 1,4-naphtoquinone (NQ) and 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-naphtoquinone (DMN), being the last one rotenone sensitive, indicating the complex integrity as purified. When incorporated in liposomes, a stimulation of the NADH:DMN oxidoreductase activity is observed by dissipation of the membrane potential, upon addition of CCCP. The purified enzyme contains 13.5 +/- 3.5 iron atoms and approximately 3.7 menaquinone per FMN. At least five iron-sulfur centers are observed by EPR spectroscopy: two [2Fe-2S](2+/1+) and three [4Fe-4S](2+/1+) centers. By fluorescence spectroscopy a still unidentified chromophore was detected in R. marinus complex I.

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyElectron Transport Complex IGram-Negative Aerobic BacteriaKineticsLiposomesMolecular WeightNADNADH, NADPH OxidoreductasesProtein SubunitsSpectrometry, FluorescenceSpectrophotometryElectron Transport Complex ILiposomesNADNADH, NADPH OxidoreductasesProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID12678433
OpenAlexW247526204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.